Contec Americas | Procurement AI Agent ROI Model
WISE Agents × Contec Americas Procurement AI Agent ROI

Interactive ROI model for automating quote intake, RFQ drafting, and vendor follow-up.

This model estimates the annual and three-year value of the procurement agent by combining direct buyer time savings, faster quote turnaround, reduced stalled RFQs, and operational control value. Implementation and ongoing costs are fixed based on the proposed commercial structure.

One-time implementation
USD $20,000
Fixed project implementation cost
Ongoing operation
USD $4,000/mo
USD $48,000 annually
Year 1 cost
USD $63,000
Implementation + 12 months ongoing

ROI Summary

Key outputs update automatically as the operational assumptions are adjusted below.

Year 1 Benefit
$0
Estimated value generated in the first full year.
Year 1 Net Value
$0
Benefit minus implementation and ongoing cost.
Year 1 ROI
0%
Net value divided by total Year 1 cost.
Payback
0 mo
Estimated time to recover the upfront implementation investment.

Adjustable Assumptions

Use the variables below to test conservative, base, and aggressive cases. The cost of WISE Agents is locked.

Number of purchasing users supported by the agent.
Time spent chasing missing information, drafting RFQs, and following up.
Portion of manual coordination work reduced by intake checks, drafts, and follow-ups.
Estimated total hourly cost of a buyer, including salary and burden.
Average volume of quote requests entering the purchasing workflow.
Share of quote requests that benefit from better intake, RFQ drafting, and follow-up.
Estimated days removed from quote cycle through faster RFQs and follow-ups.
Conservative value of moving a quote forward one day sooner.
Estimated share of quotes delayed or weakened by supplier non-response.
Share of stalled RFQs improved by automatic tracking and follow-up cadence.
Estimated margin, opportunity, or operating value from preventing an RFQ from stalling.
Value from better traceability, fewer missed items, cleaner handoffs, and consistent RFQ quality.
Expected improvement as templates, rules, and exception handling are refined.

Benefit Breakdown

The model separates value into four categories so the business case is easier to understand and defend.

Annual Benefit by Category

Updated based on the current assumptions.

Direct time savings
$0
Faster quote cycle
$0
Recovered stalled RFQs
$0
Operational control
$0
This ROI is not presented as a labor-replacement model. The value comes from freeing buyer capacity, reducing quote delays, improving supplier follow-up, and giving management better visibility into every RFQ.

Benefit vs. Cost by Year

Year 1 includes implementation. Years 2 and 3 include ongoing only.

Three-Year Financial View

Shows annual benefit, cost, net value, ROI, and cumulative net value across the first three years.

3-Year Summary

All values are estimates based on the selected assumptions.

Year Benefit Cost Net Value ROI Cumulative

Cumulative Net Value

Shows how value accumulates after project and ongoing costs.

How the Variables Are Used

Each part of the ROI model is tied to a clear operational assumption.

1. Direct Time Savings

Captures the buyer capacity recovered when the agent handles intake review, missing information detection, RFQ preparation, and follow-up tracking.

Buyers × weekly coordination hours × % reduced by agent × hourly cost × 52 weeks

2. Faster Quote Cycle Value

Estimates the value of moving quotes forward faster by reducing the time spent waiting for missing information and supplier responses.

Quotes/month × % improved × days reduced × value per accelerated day × 12 months

3. Recovered Stalled RFQs

Estimates the value of preventing RFQs from getting stuck because suppliers were not followed up with consistently.

Quotes/month × stalled RFQ rate × % recovered by agent × value per recovered RFQ × 12 months

4. Operational Control Value

A conservative annual value assigned to better traceability, fewer missed items, consistent communications, and cleaner handoffs between engineering, purchasing, vendors, and sales.

Annual control value entered by the user

5. Cost Structure

Implementation and monthly ongoing are fixed commercial terms from WISE Agents and are not adjustable in the model.

Year 1 cost = $20,000 implementation + ($4,000 × 12). Year 2+ cost = $4,000 × 12.

6. ROI and Payback

ROI measures the return after costs. Payback estimates when cumulative benefits exceed cumulative costs.

ROI = (annual benefit - annual cost) ÷ annual cost. Payback = first month cumulative net value is positive.

Interpretation

How to read the business case in plain terms.

Operational Impact

Less time chasing information

The strongest driver is reducing the time buyers spend asking for missing information, preparing repetitive RFQs, and manually checking whether vendors responded.

Commercial Impact

Quotes move faster

Faster intake, vendor matching, draft creation, and follow-up can reduce quote cycle time, improving responsiveness to customers and increasing the chance that opportunities keep moving.

Control Impact

Better visibility and accountability

The tracking table gives the purchasing manager a single source of truth for every vendor request, status, price received, missing item, and follow-up action.